1946:Â The Bible and Homosexuality
Overview
The 1946 argument is primarily championed by Kathy Baldock and her team and is the position that prior to 1946, the Bible did not condemn homosexuality. The claim is that there was a deliberate change via the translation committee of the RSV in 1946, which was the first translation to use the word “homosexual” for verses such as 1 Corinthians 6:9. The argument further claims that the original words in question, arsenokoite and malakos, actually refer to either pederasty or temple prostitution.
Kathy, in Walking the Bridgeless Canyon, goes further and addresses discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and communities, primarily over the course of the 1900s.
Who's Who?
What's What?
What do they get right?
What do they get wrong?
What do they leave out?
Here are various resources, both for and against this argument, that go through this issue:
- Pro
- Kathy Baldock
- Matthew Vines
- Colby Martin
- Unclobber, by Colby Martin (book)
- Robert Brawley
- Videos
- Neutral/Multiple views
- Bernadette Brooten
- Love Between Women, by Bernadette Brooten (book)
- Note: Bernadette Brooten is actually pro-LGBTQ, but opposes the 1946 argument.
- Love Between Women, by Bernadette Brooten (book)
- Counterpoints
- Debates/Discussions
- LGBTQ Relationships and the Bible: A Progressive and Evangelical Dialogue (featuring Sean McDowell and Colby Martin
- The Bible, Belief, & Human Sexuality (featuring Michael Burrows and Robert Gagnon)
- Homosexuality and the Church (featuring Daniel Kirk and Robert Gagnon)
- Bernadette Brooten
- Against
- Hillary Morgan Ferrer
- Becket Cook
- Christopher Yuan
- Nancy Pearcey
- Rosaria Butterfield
- Robert Gagnon
Recommended Study
If you are interested in doing a study on this subject, I would recommend the following books, in the following order:
- Critical Thinking
- Conversion Testimonies
- Christian Texts
- Pro-LGBTQÂ Texts
- Advanced Texts
If you'd like to add anything, or have corrections or recommendations, just reach out.